nathanandersonart:

Name: Barghest, Barguest

Area of Origin: Northern England

Prevalent in Northern English folklore, the Barghest is a monstrous black dog, with fiery eyes, large teeth and claws, though the name has been known to refer to ghosts or household elves in other regions of the country. The word “Ghost” was pronounced “Guest” in Northern England, and the etymology of Barghest is thought to be the combination word, Burh-ghest or “Town-Ghost”. Similar to other mythical Black Dogs like the Black Shuck, Grim, Padfoot, Gwyllgi and Gytrash, the Barghest is believed to be an omen of death, foretelling the passing of an individual by laying on or near their doorstep. In some tales, the dog is but one form the entity can shapeshift into, with other appearances being that of a headless man or woman, a white cat or a rabbit. They are said to attack lone travelers in the countryside as well as the narrow alleys in those of the old English cities.

Hello! I’m Sage! I’m interested in working with/worshiping Odin, but I have heard both good and bad things about Him and so I am unsure about working with/worshiping Odin. Do you have any advice about working with/worshiping Odin?

coldalbion:

Hello.

If I have one piece of advice regarding the Old Man, it is this:

He is what he is – utterly, ambivalently, absolutely, mysteriously, terribly, wholly, and awfully himself. The contradictions that appear in his character are just that appearances. After all, he is Grimnir – the Masked, the Hooded One.

Good, bad? These things are not things, not reference points he can be defined by. Does he not, in his quest for the Mead of Poetry, name himself Bolverk – worker of that which is evil, baleful?

This is Odin, who violates the gender norms of the times by learning seidr – becoming as woman, as witch.

Whatever you have heard, he is far, far, worse, and far, far better. At the same time. 

Understand that he will come to, will inter-face with you, in a unique shape and form. My Odin is not your Odin – the face, the mask, the role, the character he plays will be uniquely yours. And it will probably change over time.

Your relationship, should you you have one, will be unique to the two of you – though there will of course be commonalities with other peoples, because that’s the way it goes. 

That said, caveat emptor. 

You, and only you, can decide if what you give and receive in the great back-and-forth of reciprocity between humans and gods, is ‘worth’ it. You, and only you, can take the necessary steps to deal with that.

Yet the gods have their own agency, and sometimes, they have agendas and will manipulate circumstances so that certain things happen. So sometimes the ideas of ‘choice’, ‘free-will’ and suchlike get revealed as mere polite conventions.

Also, as they say in certain circles: Trust, but verify.

There’s this Thing that y’all don’t seem to get.

27snowflakes:

muchadoaboutteaching:

socialmediasocrates:

Gryffindors don’t give a shit about rules. The most hardline of them don’t even care about people. They care about justice. Right or wrong, black or white, there are no shades of grey. If it’s just, it’s always just; if it’s unjust, it’s always wrong. Hermione’s ruthlessness makes her a Gryffindor. She is absolutely sure that she is on the side of justice in everything that she does, and it’s such a Gryffindor trait.

Because Slytherins are ruthless, but they care about rules. Their own rules, usually, but rules nonetheless. They will impose parameters and limitations on themselves just so they have a framework to operate within. If doing something means violating their own internal code, then they’re not gonna do it. Even fucking Voldemort is like that. He broke every single fucking rule the Wizarding World ever put in place, but damn if he’d break his own.

And Ravenclaws? They hate rules. Fucking things just get in the way. They prevent creativity and keep people from accomplishing their goals. Ravenclaws are probably some of the most dangerous people in the entirety of the book series, because they’re brilliant and creative and ambitious and prideful, and when they snap, they do not have inhibitions. They will wreck everything that ever had the nerve to get in their way, and they will never once feel bad about it.

And then there’s Hufflepuffs. They emphasize equality. If the playing field is equal, then all other good things will come from there. People hear that, and they think that Hufflepuffs are pushovers. They cast them as the shy ones, the fearful ones, the insecure ones. Really, they’re none of these things. They are nice, accepting, friendly, this is all true, but they are also entirely willing to fight anyone that steps up to the plate talking shit. Hufflepuffs will defend themselves and other people until they drop dead, and it’s infuriating to see that only ever attributed to Gryffindors. Because the big difference is that a Gryffindor believes in acceptable causalties, and a Hufflepuff will knock your teeth down your fucking throat for even suggesting such a disgusting idea. For Hufflepuffs, there are no acceptable casualties; any loss of life is utterly unacceptable.

There are a lot of people that talk about House stereotyping, and then turn around and perpetuate further stereotypes. Gryffindors are not necessarily knights in shining armor; Slytherins are not necessarily callous villains; Ravenclaws are much more than just intelligent, and Hufflepuff is not the motherfucking potato House.

Proud Puff.

No wonder hogwarts is so dangerous. No one fucking follows the rules.

orriculum:

cherubae:

Gosh I keep seeing all of these anti-”aesthetic” witchcraft posts on my dash and it has me feeling so down. I have OCPD and making everything look a certain way or physically feel a certain way really helps refine everything and make things feel “right” for me. Sometimes people just like to make things pretty, and that’s okay. 
Witchcraft is so personal and you have to do what’s best for you; don’t let anyone tell you your craft is “too aesthetic” or “not aesthetic enough.” Neither side of the spectrum disqualifies you as a good witch.

i feel this. for me personally, i like having a very witchy vibe. i build my identity visually, and a lot of my craft draws on how i feel when i see my surroundings. 

but on that same note, i  really want people to know it’s not mandatory. if you want it, go for it, but it’s never required to make magic.

Under the Roses

blackthornwren:

When I first fell headlong into witchcraft, something like seventeen years ago, it had to be kept secret. Everything had to be hidden away, in various places, scattered under the bed, the dresser, behind cabinets, in drawers, and as completely innocuous as possible and all of it behind a bedroom door that stayed locked more often than not.

It’s not like that now, and while I don’t disassemble my altars or hide my books away from disapproving family, I still keep things very secretive.

The term I use for it is sub rosa, meaning “under the rose”. Basically, it seems to originate from Eros giving a rose to Harpocrates to make sure that Aphrodite’s indiscretions would be kept secret. I’m generalizing (poorly) and using the Wikipedia summary, forgive me. The roses came first, the why always seemed less important.

Historically, the concept of sub rosa continued, used in the Middle Ages and onward. You can see roses carved onto confessional boxes for privacy, and sometimes roses were integrated onto the ceilings in people’s homes to signify that whatever was discussed would be kept secret, or under the rose.

I’ve also seen this similar sort of concept woven into pop-culture, in a few books but most recently in Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell. Lady Pole’s inability to speak because she was bound by a rose at the mouth.

Dried roses hang in clusters about my room where all of my work is done. I don’t even remember when I started doing it, I just knew that I should. Now the air moves through them and in the quiet, I can hear the dried rustle of the petals scraping against one another – whispering. They’ve become an important symbol for me, a reminder every time I look at them, though the meaning has changed over the years.

They are both a spell and a promise. And every December, I’ve replaced them with fresh ones and renewed the vow. It’s an unspoken agreement: I keep their secrets and they keep mine. 

A spell woven to protect this part of me that I keep hidden, to keep it safe from prying eyes and wandering hands. A fascination, a distraction to keep them from looking too long, from asking questions.  

A promise to the gods and ungods that I will keep the secrets they gift me with. That whatever I am shown or told will be kept quiet. This is a promise I hold sacred.  

So far, it holds true and has taken on a life of it’s own. The spirits hold me accountable and tell me when to keep silent. There have been many times I’ve wanted to speak; I’ve even wanted to post things on this blog and find that I simply cannot. I am stopped every time, my promise won’t let me – and for good reason, they are experiences that are not really meant to be shared.

So be mindful of the promises you make to the roses, especially when you think no one is listening.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started